
This is not a thesis. I'm not going to fully elucidate this idea with perfect logic and plenty of supporting material, but to simply put what is already clear in order.
The Criterion
'Practice is the Only Criterion of Truth' (Chinese: 实践是检验真理的唯一标准, click to enlarge the snapshot on the right)is a title of an editorial of Guangming Daily on May 10th, 1978, a critical point in Chinese modern history when the Cultural Revolution had just ended and people were confused between the right and the wrong, the real and the fake. As the core of our ideology, the Marxism should be the only source to seek for the answer. Fortunately we sought one then. The 'only-criterion' article has a profound effect on the later history of China, because it totally freed people's mind and make available any possibility on this land. Every student here now know this famous saying.
The Limitation of Practice
At the front-line of unknown truth, scientist (at least Chinese ones), surly cannot understand this criterion better. Galileo's experiment on the leaning tower of Pisa set a perfect example for us. However, Newton mechanics, which has been proved by almost all practice, was still challenged and had to be developed after Einstein's theory of relativity was (or its deductions were) also proved by new and coming observations.
When practice is limited by the environmental condition at the moment, the truth so obtained is accordingly limited. Human develops his skill of practice, that is, technology, for a wider and deeper coverage. The establishment of the theory of relativity was obviously owing to our the enhanced ability to see into the space with stronger telescopes.
'Useful' Truth
Because the universe is infinite, our practice is always partial, and so is our 'truth' at the same time. But it is impractical, if not impossible, to pursue the 'ultimate' knowledge of the universe right away. It is well enough to know what is useful for the current practice. We don't consider the mass increase when dealing with an accelerating car (in fact we may be clever enough to consider the air resistance instead), because Newton mechanic is useful enough. We need only 'useful' truth, by useful I meaning consistent with current practice.
Inconvenient Truth

If each of us could tolerate the imperfection of truth about physical world, I'm sure much fewer would allow such imperfection in knowledge about our bodies and the treatments on them. This is why medical science is often chosen for target by anti-science powers. Similarly, for those theories that are hard or impossible to proved by practice (experiments, observations, etc.), like the one of evolution which could only thrive on evidences, people can literally act as members of the jury in a court and judge its truthfulness by their own believes. The arbitrariness here is again music to anti-scientists.
This problem is somewhat beyond the Practice Criterion. It concerns the nature of science, and its relationship with truth or human knowledge. Still there have been legendary answers to this issue, of which I only recommend two here: Dialectics of Nature by Friedrich Engels and Human Knowledge by Bertrand Russell. All I want to mention here is that science, although not necessary a religion, indeed has presumptions or postulates that need to be held a priori.